Accessibility

Table of Contents

Accessibility Statement Compliance Status Test Results Inaccessible Content Disproportionate Burden Derogations Content Not Subject to Accessibility Obligation Establishment of This Accessibility Statement Technologies Used for Service Implementation User Agents, Assistive Technologies, and Tools Used to Verify Accessibility Site Pages Subject to Compliance Verification Feedback and Contact Recourse Options

Accessibility Statement Eiffage is committed to making its websites, intranets, extranets, and its mobile applications, software packages, and digital urban furniture accessible in accordance with Article 47 of Law No. 2005-102 of February 11, 2005.

To this end, Eiffage implements the following strategy and actions:

  • The development of a multi-year accessibility plan 2025-2027
  • The implementation of a 2025 action plan including a review of actions carried out in 2024

This accessibility statement applies to the Eiffage Génie Civil website (https://www.eiffagegeniecivil.com/).

Compliance Status The Eiffage Génie Civil website is non-compliant with the General Framework for Improving Accessibility (RGAA), version 4.1.2, due to the non-compliances listed below.

Test Results The compliance audit carried out by Tanaguru on May 07, 2025, reveals that:

  • Compliance rate of the audited sample: 48% of the RGAA version 4.1.2 criteria are met across the entire sample (12 pages).
  • Average rate per page: The average compliance rate for each page in the sample is 69%.

Inaccessible Content The content listed below is inaccessible for the following reasons:

Theme 1: Images

  • Criterion 1.1: Some informative images do not have alternative text.
  • Criterion 1.2: Some decorative images are not correctly ignored by assistive technologies.
  • Criterion 1.3: Some informative images have irrelevant alternative text.
  • Criterion 1.9: Some image captions are not correctly linked to the corresponding image.

Theme 2: Frames

  • Criterion 2.2: The title of some frames is not relevant.

Theme 3: Colors

  • Criterion 3.1: Some information is conveyed solely by color.
  • Criterion 3.2: The contrast between the color of some texts and the background color is insufficient.
  • Criterion 3.3: The contrast between the colors of some interface components or graphical elements conveying information and the background color is insufficient.

Theme 4: Multimedia

  • Criterion 4.4: The subtitles of some pre-recorded synchronized temporal media are not relevant.

Theme 6: Links

  • Criterion 6.1: Some links are not explicit.

Theme 7: Scripts

  • Criterion 7.1: Some scripts are incompatible with assistive technologies.
  • Criterion 7.3: Some scripts are not keyboard-controllable.
  • Criterion 7.4: Users are not warned about context changes.
  • Criterion 7.5: Some status messages are not correctly rendered by assistive technologies.

Theme 8: Mandatory Elements

  • Criterion 8.2: The generated source code is not valid / does not comply with writing rules.
  • Criterion 8.6: The title of some pages lacks precision and relevance.
  • Criterion 8.7: Language changes are not indicated in the source code.
  • Criterion 8.9: Some tags are used solely for presentation purposes.

Theme 9: Information Structure

  • Criterion 9.1: The heading hierarchy is not appropriate.
  • Criterion 9.3: Some lists are incorrectly structured in the code.

Theme 10: Information Presentation

  • Criterion 10.2: Some visible informative content disappears when style sheets are deactivated.
  • Criterion 10.4: Some texts lose readability when character size is increased up to 200%.
  • Criterion 10.5: CSS declarations for element background and font colors are not correctly used.
  • Criterion 10.7: The browser's native focus style is removed or degraded.
  • Criterion 10.8: Some hidden content should be rendered by assistive technologies.
  • Criterion 10.13: Some additional content cannot be hidden by the user after its appearance.

Theme 11: Forms

  • Criterion 11.1: Some form fields do not have labels.
  • Criterion 11.2: Some labels associated with form fields are not relevant.
  • Criterion 11.5: Some fields of the same nature are not grouped within a <fieldset> tag.
  • Criterion 11.9: The title of some buttons is not relevant.
  • Criterion 11.10: Input control is not relevant (indication of mandatory fields, example of expected data type/format, specific error message, etc.).

Theme 12: Navigation

  • Criterion 12.6: The different areas present in the pages (header, main navigation, main content, footer, and search engine) cannot be reached or skipped.
  • Criterion 12.8: In each web page, the tab order within the content is sometimes inconsistent.
  • Criterion 12.9: Elements intended to receive focus are not reachable with the tab key.
  • Criterion 12.11: Some additional content is not keyboard-accessible.

Theme 13: Consultation

  • Criterion 13.3: Some office documents are not accessible.

Disproportionate Burden Derogations None

Content Not Subject to Accessibility Obligation None

Establishment of This Accessibility Statement This statement was established on May 07, 2025.

Technologies Used for Service Implementation HTML 5 CSS 3 JavaScript

User Agents, Assistive Technologies, and Tools Used to Verify Accessibility Web page tests were conducted with the following combinations:

  • Firefox and NVDA (latest version)
  • Safari and VoiceOver (latest version)
  • Firefox and JAWS (previous version)

The following tools were used during the evaluation:

  • Developer tools integrated into the Firefox browser
  • Tanaguru Webext extension
  • Web Developer extension
  • Stylus extension
  • HeadingsMap extension
  • Colour Contrast Analyser
  • W3C HTML Validator

Site Pages Subject to Compliance Verification Page 1: Home Page 2: Contact Page 3: Site Map Page 4: Legal Notice Page 5: Search Results Page 6: Profiles Page 7: Projects Page 8: Demolition Deconstruction Page 9: Our Businesses Page 10: News Page 11: Article Page 12: Accessibility

Feedback and Contact If you are unable to access content or a service, you can contact the site manager to be directed to an accessible alternative or to obtain the content in another format:

Recourse Options This procedure is to be used in the following case: you have reported an accessibility defect to the site manager and have not received a satisfactory response.

  • Write a message to the Défenseur des droits (Defender of Rights)
  • Contact the Défenseur des droits delegate in your region
  • Send a letter by post (free, no stamp required): Défenseur des droits Libre réponse 71120 75342 Paris CEDEX 07